<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black Mayonnaise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/</link>
	<description>The Shortest Distance Between You and Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:16:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/comment-page-1/#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 05:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/#comment-1745</guid>
		<description>I worked at a moving company during the 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s that was down the block from Newtown Creek.Every day when passing this waterway,the only word that came to head was one...Sinful.How could this happen under everyones noses for so many years? The owners of the moving company used to refer to Greenpoint as &quot;Skunk Hollow&quot;,but I never found the humor in that.Nice to see that this long neglected waterway is being cleaned up,but honestly I can&#039;t see it being restored in under 100 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked at a moving company during the 70&#8217;s and 80&#8217;s that was down the block from Newtown Creek.Every day when passing this waterway,the only word that came to head was one&#8230;Sinful.How could this happen under everyones noses for so many years? The owners of the moving company used to refer to Greenpoint as &#8220;Skunk Hollow&#8221;,but I never found the humor in that.Nice to see that this long neglected waterway is being cleaned up,but honestly I can&#8217;t see it being restored in under 100 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Resisdent of Bushwick</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/comment-page-1/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>Former Resisdent of Bushwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>I was living in on Bushwick Avenue around 1980&#039;s and residents of at least 3 buildings reported the drinking water has a oil taste once every too often.  I reported to the city and the DEP said they inspected our water and found no problem.   I asked ALL three buildings about when did they come by to test, not ONE superintendent of these buildings know of the DEP presences.  Is this really related to the oil spill, I am no expert to tell. Do I feel there&#039;s a cover up?  Sure do!  I think it&#039;s not just at the inspectors level either.  I give up calling DEP after I left the area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was living in on Bushwick Avenue around 1980&#8217;s and residents of at least 3 buildings reported the drinking water has a oil taste once every too often.  I reported to the city and the DEP said they inspected our water and found no problem.   I asked ALL three buildings about when did they come by to test, not ONE superintendent of these buildings know of the DEP presences.  Is this really related to the oil spill, I am no expert to tell. Do I feel there&#8217;s a cover up?  Sure do!  I think it&#8217;s not just at the inspectors level either.  I give up calling DEP after I left the area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logan</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/comment-page-1/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>Dear Anyone who listens to &quot;Greenpoint Archive&quot;

  I have been doing a lot of research on this topic since my recent move to Greenpoint, and I have found that &quot;Greenpoint Archive&quot; has gone from website to website promoting this same &quot;pro-corporation&quot; nonsense.  Most of what they say is false or skewed at best.  I suggest you do your own research instead of listen to them.  
   To address one point made by Greenpoint Archive....yes, the general cancer rates are the same, or a bit lower in greenpoint than in the other burrows, BUT the leukemia rates are DOUBLE.  This is important because benzene is a known cause for leukemia.  And it just so happens that the benzene vapor is the main biproduct of oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Anyone who listens to &#8220;Greenpoint Archive&#8221;</p>
<p>  I have been doing a lot of research on this topic since my recent move to Greenpoint, and I have found that &#8220;Greenpoint Archive&#8221; has gone from website to website promoting this same &#8220;pro-corporation&#8221; nonsense.  Most of what they say is false or skewed at best.  I suggest you do your own research instead of listen to them.<br />
   To address one point made by Greenpoint Archive&#8230;.yes, the general cancer rates are the same, or a bit lower in greenpoint than in the other burrows, BUT the leukemia rates are DOUBLE.  This is important because benzene is a known cause for leukemia.  And it just so happens that the benzene vapor is the main biproduct of oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Hofmann</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Hofmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 05:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/#comment-887</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m responding to &quot;Greenpoint Archive&quot;.
I notice that you keep posting the same message in many blogs stating that I am &quot;lying&quot; while you hide behind the name &quot;Greenpoint Archive&quot;. Why not sign your name? Not signing your name says much about your lack of integrity and honesty. Are you afraid that YOU are the person committing slander? 
Laura Hofmann
bargeparkpals@webtv.net
bargeparkpals@msn.com

My response to you can be found here.
http://community-2.webtv.net/bargeparkpals/BlogResponse/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m responding to &#8220;Greenpoint Archive&#8221;.<br />
I notice that you keep posting the same message in many blogs stating that I am &#8220;lying&#8221; while you hide behind the name &#8220;Greenpoint Archive&#8221;. Why not sign your name? Not signing your name says much about your lack of integrity and honesty. Are you afraid that YOU are the person committing slander?<br />
Laura Hofmann<br />
<a href="mailto:bargeparkpals@webtv.net">bargeparkpals@webtv.net</a><br />
<a href="mailto:bargeparkpals@msn.com">bargeparkpals@msn.com</a></p>
<p>My response to you can be found here.<br />
<a href="http://community-2.webtv.net/bargeparkpals/BlogResponse/" rel="nofollow">http://community-2.webtv.net/bargeparkpals/BlogResponse/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greenpoint Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Greenpoint Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/#comment-843</guid>
		<description>Although the community is unanimous in its determination to have the spill completely cleaned up and to reclaim the Newtown creek, some question whether the resurfacing of this nearly 30 year old oil spill story is being used to attack the community after it won its rezoning battle against the wishes of Brooklyn based politicians (and divert attention away from cancer cluster issue in Williamsburg). The media reports have not included the fact that: 1) More than half of the 17 million gallon spill has already been cleaned up. 2) The remediation process has been going on, with the blessing of local elected officials, since 1992 and continues. 3) The spill is almost entirely under the remote western industrial section of Greenpoint near the East Williamsburg industrial park. There are a few residential streets near Kingsland Avenue that are above the spill, but the vast majority of residential properties are not involved with the spill. 4) The Newtown Creek runs along Greenpoint, Williamsburg, Maspeth and Bushwick, but the news articles only mention Greenpoint. 5) The Astral Oil Spill in Williamsburg is not being mentioned. 6) Articles keep talking about what the long term health effects of the spill will be, but ignore the fact that the spill had been around for fifty years already and health data shows no abnormal spike in health related issues.
The Riverkeepers Group renamed the Exxon oil spill &quot;The Greenpoint oil spill&quot;, in what some think was a mean spirited attempt to malign the Greenpoint community. It is curious to name an environmental tragedy after its victim and not the perpetrator. The Exxon Valdez disaster was not called the Prince William Sound&#039;s Alaska Oil spill. The NY Post, in an article on Oct 15th by Angela Montefinise, and Senator Charles Schumer at a press conference on October 16 incorrectly reported that there was a potential cancer cluster in Greenpoint near the oil spill. However, three cases of an extremely rare sarcoma cancer are actually on a single block in Williamsburg (nowhere near the oil spill, not even in the same zip code). One more case is five blocks away and even further away from Greenpoint and the oil spill. In fact, one victim got cancer after residing in the same apartment as an unrelated cancer victim and previous tenant. Sarcomas are a very rare form of cancer, and as reported in the Post article, &quot;You don&#039;t see three in one block,&quot; Dr. Isaac Eliaz, a California expert on metal detoxification, said. &quot;Someone should be paying attention to this.&quot; Dr. Kanti Rai, chief of oncology at the Long Island Jewish Medical Center, agreed that it was &quot;worth an investigation.&quot; Unfortunately, the Senator is calling for a health study with regard to the oil spill and is ignoring a potentially very serious heath disaster in the Williamsburg community. Neighborhood Roots has reached out numerous times to Senator Schumer&#039;s Washington office&#039;s communications director Eric Schultz, and Bret Rumbeck who handles environmental issues for the Senator, with no calls being returned.
Curiously, at the same press conference Congressman Anthony Weiner stated that Greenpoint has a 25% higher asthma rate than the rest of the city. The only problem is that the two health studies done by the state and city show the asthma rate in Greenpoint to be between 25% and 50% lower than the rest of the city along with a 10% lower cancer rate. The State DEC is aware of toxic industrial sites in Willliamsburg near Devoe Street that could potentially be the cause of these rare cancers, but no one is calling for that study. &quot;Instead, there seems to be a no holds barred attack on Greenpoint and a blatant disregard for the health concerns of the Willamsburg community&quot;. One must question whether the recent support of massive residential development in Williamsburg and the historic resistance from Brooklyn politicians (including Borough President Howard Golden) to residential development along the recently rezoned Greenpoint East River waterfront (not near the spill) has anything to do with this dissemination of lies and the timing of these lawsuits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the community is unanimous in its determination to have the spill completely cleaned up and to reclaim the Newtown creek, some question whether the resurfacing of this nearly 30 year old oil spill story is being used to attack the community after it won its rezoning battle against the wishes of Brooklyn based politicians (and divert attention away from cancer cluster issue in Williamsburg). The media reports have not included the fact that: 1) More than half of the 17 million gallon spill has already been cleaned up. 2) The remediation process has been going on, with the blessing of local elected officials, since 1992 and continues. 3) The spill is almost entirely under the remote western industrial section of Greenpoint near the East Williamsburg industrial park. There are a few residential streets near Kingsland Avenue that are above the spill, but the vast majority of residential properties are not involved with the spill. 4) The Newtown Creek runs along Greenpoint, Williamsburg, Maspeth and Bushwick, but the news articles only mention Greenpoint. 5) The Astral Oil Spill in Williamsburg is not being mentioned. 6) Articles keep talking about what the long term health effects of the spill will be, but ignore the fact that the spill had been around for fifty years already and health data shows no abnormal spike in health related issues.<br />
The Riverkeepers Group renamed the Exxon oil spill &#8220;The Greenpoint oil spill&#8221;, in what some think was a mean spirited attempt to malign the Greenpoint community. It is curious to name an environmental tragedy after its victim and not the perpetrator. The Exxon Valdez disaster was not called the Prince William Sound&#8217;s Alaska Oil spill. The NY Post, in an article on Oct 15th by Angela Montefinise, and Senator Charles Schumer at a press conference on October 16 incorrectly reported that there was a potential cancer cluster in Greenpoint near the oil spill. However, three cases of an extremely rare sarcoma cancer are actually on a single block in Williamsburg (nowhere near the oil spill, not even in the same zip code). One more case is five blocks away and even further away from Greenpoint and the oil spill. In fact, one victim got cancer after residing in the same apartment as an unrelated cancer victim and previous tenant. Sarcomas are a very rare form of cancer, and as reported in the Post article, &#8220;You don&#8217;t see three in one block,&#8221; Dr. Isaac Eliaz, a California expert on metal detoxification, said. &#8220;Someone should be paying attention to this.&#8221; Dr. Kanti Rai, chief of oncology at the Long Island Jewish Medical Center, agreed that it was &#8220;worth an investigation.&#8221; Unfortunately, the Senator is calling for a health study with regard to the oil spill and is ignoring a potentially very serious heath disaster in the Williamsburg community. Neighborhood Roots has reached out numerous times to Senator Schumer&#8217;s Washington office&#8217;s communications director Eric Schultz, and Bret Rumbeck who handles environmental issues for the Senator, with no calls being returned.<br />
Curiously, at the same press conference Congressman Anthony Weiner stated that Greenpoint has a 25% higher asthma rate than the rest of the city. The only problem is that the two health studies done by the state and city show the asthma rate in Greenpoint to be between 25% and 50% lower than the rest of the city along with a 10% lower cancer rate. The State DEC is aware of toxic industrial sites in Willliamsburg near Devoe Street that could potentially be the cause of these rare cancers, but no one is calling for that study. &#8220;Instead, there seems to be a no holds barred attack on Greenpoint and a blatant disregard for the health concerns of the Willamsburg community&#8221;. One must question whether the recent support of massive residential development in Williamsburg and the historic resistance from Brooklyn politicians (including Borough President Howard Golden) to residential development along the recently rezoned Greenpoint East River waterfront (not near the spill) has anything to do with this dissemination of lies and the timing of these lawsuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greenpoint Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Greenpoint Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/#comment-842</guid>
		<description>The oil story is 30 years old and was never hidden. The clean up has been going on since the early 90&#039;s with regular annual public meetings in the community providing updates. Health data shows no abnormal spike in health related issues even after 50 years.
VBS also conveniently leaves out the fact that: 1) More than half of the 17 million gallon spill has already been cleaned up.  2) The remediation process has been going on, with the blessing of local elected officials, since 1992 and continues.  3) The spill is almost entirely under the remote western industrial section of Greenpoint near the East Williamsburg industrial park. There are a few residential streets near Kingsland Avenue that are above the spill, but the vast majority of residential properties are not involved with the spill.
The oil is not oozing up as the video suggests. There are no vapors covering the community as the video suggests. VBS never explains that Dorothy Swick&#039;s problem arose because a neighbor decided to illegally drill for a well in his backyard thirty feet down to reach a contaminated aquifer. Her vapor problem was created by that stupidity, not by any oil bubbling up.
Athough &quot;Toxic Brooklyn&quot; covers some of Williamsburg&#039;s environmental issues in the first two episodes, they also carefully mixed in many clips of people saying how much they love Williamsburg. Even the narrator announces &quot;everyone wants a piece of funkytown&quot;. The video is laced with attractive shots of billyburg shop and boutiques. When it comes to Greenpoint, no such video. Only repeated clips of our notorious Laura Hoffman complaining and lying about the neighborhood. The video never mentions that she is one of only six residents who joined Riverkeepers lawsuit against the oil companies for the oil spill, or that none of the six plaintiffs live above the spill. It is a tragedy to be dealing with an illness in the family, but that does not excuse anyone from spreading hurtful lies about a community. She mentions the Greenpoint Incinerator even though there is no Greenpoint incinerator. The smoke stacks the camera zooms in on are the Con Edison stacks in Astoria. Mrs. Hoffman has been a loud voice protesting the rezoning and waterfront development in Greenpoint. This may explain the purpose of her scare tactics.
Tom Stagg, who is in the video, claims to be living on top of oil even though Newell Street is not where the spill is. What a sloppy fact checking job VBS did with this. You see, Mr. Stagg&#039;s property is adjacent to McGuinness Blvd which went through a major reconstruction including digging all of the old building foundations from the street. No oil was found during the project. Mr. Stagg is not telling the truth. Greenpoint has lower cancer rates than Park Slope, Brooklyn Heights and many other Bklyn neighborhoods. It also has some of the lowest cancer rates in all of nyc/nys. These stats can easily be seen at
http://www.nyhealth.gov/statistics/cancer/registry/pdf/volume1nycneighborhoods.pdf
But of course that was never mentioned in the video. Just 5 straight episodes dedicated to spreading exaggerations and lies about Greenpoint.
Cutesy shots of hipsters frolicking in Williamsburg juxtaposed against two questionable individuals making claims that people in Greenpoint are falling victim to cancer makes it clear what VBS&#039;s agenda is. All these lies started when Greenpoint won its battle against Community Board 1 and local Brooklyn based politicians to have its East River waterfront (nowhere near the spill) rezoned for residential development. Hope VBS got a nice check for their work. What&#039;s the going rate for slander these days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The oil story is 30 years old and was never hidden. The clean up has been going on since the early 90&#8217;s with regular annual public meetings in the community providing updates. Health data shows no abnormal spike in health related issues even after 50 years.<br />
VBS also conveniently leaves out the fact that: 1) More than half of the 17 million gallon spill has already been cleaned up.  2) The remediation process has been going on, with the blessing of local elected officials, since 1992 and continues.  3) The spill is almost entirely under the remote western industrial section of Greenpoint near the East Williamsburg industrial park. There are a few residential streets near Kingsland Avenue that are above the spill, but the vast majority of residential properties are not involved with the spill.<br />
The oil is not oozing up as the video suggests. There are no vapors covering the community as the video suggests. VBS never explains that Dorothy Swick&#8217;s problem arose because a neighbor decided to illegally drill for a well in his backyard thirty feet down to reach a contaminated aquifer. Her vapor problem was created by that stupidity, not by any oil bubbling up.<br />
Athough &#8220;Toxic Brooklyn&#8221; covers some of Williamsburg&#8217;s environmental issues in the first two episodes, they also carefully mixed in many clips of people saying how much they love Williamsburg. Even the narrator announces &#8220;everyone wants a piece of funkytown&#8221;. The video is laced with attractive shots of billyburg shop and boutiques. When it comes to Greenpoint, no such video. Only repeated clips of our notorious Laura Hoffman complaining and lying about the neighborhood. The video never mentions that she is one of only six residents who joined Riverkeepers lawsuit against the oil companies for the oil spill, or that none of the six plaintiffs live above the spill. It is a tragedy to be dealing with an illness in the family, but that does not excuse anyone from spreading hurtful lies about a community. She mentions the Greenpoint Incinerator even though there is no Greenpoint incinerator. The smoke stacks the camera zooms in on are the Con Edison stacks in Astoria. Mrs. Hoffman has been a loud voice protesting the rezoning and waterfront development in Greenpoint. This may explain the purpose of her scare tactics.<br />
Tom Stagg, who is in the video, claims to be living on top of oil even though Newell Street is not where the spill is. What a sloppy fact checking job VBS did with this. You see, Mr. Stagg&#8217;s property is adjacent to McGuinness Blvd which went through a major reconstruction including digging all of the old building foundations from the street. No oil was found during the project. Mr. Stagg is not telling the truth. Greenpoint has lower cancer rates than Park Slope, Brooklyn Heights and many other Bklyn neighborhoods. It also has some of the lowest cancer rates in all of nyc/nys. These stats can easily be seen at<br />
<a href="http://www.nyhealth.gov/statistics/cancer/registry/pdf/volume1nycneighborhoods.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nyhealth.gov/statistics/cancer/registry/pdf/volume1nycneighborhoods.pdf</a><br />
But of course that was never mentioned in the video. Just 5 straight episodes dedicated to spreading exaggerations and lies about Greenpoint.<br />
Cutesy shots of hipsters frolicking in Williamsburg juxtaposed against two questionable individuals making claims that people in Greenpoint are falling victim to cancer makes it clear what VBS&#8217;s agenda is. All these lies started when Greenpoint won its battle against Community Board 1 and local Brooklyn based politicians to have its East River waterfront (nowhere near the spill) rezoned for residential development. Hope VBS got a nice check for their work. What&#8217;s the going rate for slander these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Weingarten</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Weingarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/#comment-840</guid>
		<description>WOW.  I just cannot believe this is happening right here in our backyard -- and for 50 years!  I just cannot get over it.  I am going to check out the Greenpoint Oil Spill documentary on vbs.tv.  If its good, perhaps we can do a screening in my Lower East Side bar.  Get at me if interested:  garyverlaine@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW.  I just cannot believe this is happening right here in our backyard &#8212; and for 50 years!  I just cannot get over it.  I am going to check out the Greenpoint Oil Spill documentary on vbs.tv.  If its good, perhaps we can do a screening in my Lower East Side bar.  Get at me if interested:  <a href="mailto:garyverlaine@gmail.com">garyverlaine@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trace</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>trace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/#comment-799</guid>
		<description>On Monday April 9th the premiere of the VBS documentary on the Greenpoint Oil Spill will air free of charge on vbs.tv

preview here:
http://www.myspace.com/thetoxicapple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday April 9th the premiere of the VBS documentary on the Greenpoint Oil Spill will air free of charge on vbs.tv</p>
<p>preview here:<br />
<a href="http://www.myspace.com/thetoxicapple" rel="nofollow">http://www.myspace.com/thetoxicapple</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cemre Durusoy</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Cemre Durusoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Thank you for shedding light on a mysteriously little known urban catastrophe that is literally right under our feet.  As a greenpoint resident I am curious to find out what the extent of the spill is underground. Has there been any studies done to determine the boundaries of contaminated land?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for shedding light on a mysteriously little known urban catastrophe that is literally right under our feet.  As a greenpoint resident I am curious to find out what the extent of the spill is underground. Has there been any studies done to determine the boundaries of contaminated land?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Andruszkow-Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Andruszkow-Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2007/01/24/liebach_env_greenpointe/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>Excellent story! Glad to see it is being kept in the forefront.
As a former Greenpoint resident, I hope that someday this lingering problem will finally be addressed so that more of Greenpoints residents do not have to suffer from the various health problems that arise from living around such a mess.
Don&#039;t let the powers that be forget about this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent story! Glad to see it is being kept in the forefront.<br />
As a former Greenpoint resident, I hope that someday this lingering problem will finally be addressed so that more of Greenpoints residents do not have to suffer from the various health problems that arise from living around such a mess.<br />
Don&#8217;t let the powers that be forget about this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
