Comments on: Are Polar Bears Victims of the New Cold War?

By: not my real name

not my real name — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:31:18 +0000

Global Warming isn’t real, its called climate change. and i predict that after this global warming scare is over, we will be overrun by polar bears due to the Global Freezing that comes after the Global Warming.

By: korntey

korntey — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:03:48 +0000

people who take this as a joke are plain ignorant n uneducated. these bears were put here for a reason so therefore we should value them.

By: Amafag

Amafag — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:23:13 +0000

I would just like to say to please not act like you know everything on these animals and leave a completely ignorant comment, or report. I do not wish to insult anyone, but please don’t.
Thank you

By: Mandy

Mandy — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:48:36 +0000

This helped a lot on my report for school thanks a bunch, but still that is sad with 4 dead bears floating in the sea.

By: TJ LOVELL

TJ LOVELL — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:18:05 +0000

Follow the money indeed! The U.S. government funding of AGW research has increased from $190 million in the late 1990’s to over $4 billion in 2006 with a 15% increase scheduled in 2007. That money DOES NOT GO to AGW skeptics. In the academic community there is no penalty for being PRO-AGW, but any skepticism about the .054 of 1 percent of the atmosphere causing the environment to crash. Of all the CO2 emitted MAN is responsible for less than 4% and the cost of reducing this amount is tantamount to mass murder for the 3 billion people in the developing nations of the world.

By: Brikaity maxred

Brikaity maxred — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:41:31 +0000

the polar bear needs more info and so does the star fish.

By: sara

sara — Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:10:21 +0000

noo

By: Julie Kay Smithson

Julie Kay Smithson — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:27:38 +0000

Mitch Taylor, Fred Goldberg, Matt Cronin and others have become targets for marginalization because the cash cow of “global warming” is threatened by their research and science. Does that mean their work is less accurate? Hardly. These men not only live in the parts of the world where polar bears also live; they are individuals with character that they do not compromise in order to be viewed as “policially correct” or “popular.” Cronin’s article, “Polar Bears in PA,” may be read here: http://www.propertyrightsresearch.org/2006/articles11/polar_bears_in_pa.htm and should at least “break the ice” regarding the healthy polar bear population. Goldberg’s questioning of polar bear “drowning deaths” is valid. Taylor’s work is careful, meticulous and worthy of careful study. Before getting one’s exercise by jumping to conclusions or flying off the handle, read more about these three men and their work.

By: mrunn

mrunn — Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:06:59 +0000

It appears that Fred Goldberg does freelance work for the oil industry. As for Stettner, there aren’t aren’t many individuals who consider themselves serious thinkers who refer to consensus based scientific papers as “alarmist.” I imagine he consults a higher power for his analyses . . .

In any regard, since I consider polar bears cuter than penguins, let’s ship the poor fellows to Antartica.

By: julie

julie — Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:28:34 +0000

Just curious what “cash-cow” Stettner thinks the “global warming alarmists” would be cashing in on? “Follow the money” and you will find the Iraq war = OIL.

And as far as “lies to support their argument,” we have only to look to our dear government to thank for that shining example.

Look closely into any environmentalist’s motives for preserving the environment and i seriously doubt you will find much more money than what is truly needed to try to preserve the only planet we have.