Comments on: Before the Big Bang

By: Caran Martin

Caran Martin — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:30:27 +0000

isaac has a litte…

nose.

By: Caran Martin

Caran Martin — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:29:27 +0000

you must be a virgin then…

By: Artis

Artis — Fri, 22 May 2009 03:43:08 +0000

The fact is you will never know all the facts!

By: Artis

Artis — Fri, 22 May 2009 03:40:49 +0000

All you big brains need too focus on mankind, or should I brake it down the human race! As there is only one race on this planet HUMAN! good day and good hunting.

By: Boomer Blossom

Boomer Blossom — Mon, 11 May 2009 17:36:20 +0000

This is all ridiculous, blah blah blah. I need some damn facts!!

By: JC

JC — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:40:38 +0000

All plausible explanations, but in my opinion there is too much intelligent design in everything studied to allow acceptance of the big bang without a supreme person to cause it. I can accept the spatialization of time, and that time would not have existed before the BB, but matter itself had to result from some action or thought. It’s the cause and effect idea again, I just can’t get around it.

By: Derrick Hahn

Derrick Hahn — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:38:37 +0000

Alright, I’m thirteen. My idea of the big bang and how it started was that it was started by a type of atom which consisted GRAVITY, LOW PRESSURE, and HIGH PRESSURE. Gravity broke off which started the “Big Bang”. I think this because it, to me, makes the most sense. One: The idea of the previous universe contracting back and reflecting with the power to make a new universe is wrong. Two: “dark matter” is pushing out the universe, so how can it retract? Anyway, this theory has many flaws. This is my theory!

By: justathought

justathought — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:45:19 +0000

I have been saying for years before anyone knew that every galaxy has a black hole within it. My theory is this, eventually every galaxy will be swallowed up by their own black holes, then all black holes will swallow one another to form a large supermassive black hole that will swallow all matter and dark matter in all the Universe. This will eventually cause an increase in temparture and pressure at the other end that we know nothing of, but what if the other end will be the new Universe where it will all be released again for a new bang. Just a thought!

By: crespo

crespo — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:25:00 +0000

the Universe runs by immutable laws, the Big Bang requires that these laws which hold the very fabric of the universe together be broken…how is this possible?
The further looked into, the deeper the problem will become, and the only way it is explainable by our finite minds is to put our faith in not the imaginations of men whose paradigms shift and change at every whim and fancy, but in the hands of the one who created it in the first place.
I can’t logically come to any other conclusion, I don’t like it, but face facts, there appears to be something more like a mind behind this universe than anything else…what power!

By: Paul Lillington

Paul Lillington — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 21:57:38 +0000

There is another explanation for what was there at the beginning.
Perhaps the universe was always there, and will always be there. All the evidence for an expanding universe and the big bang, is biased on measuring the rate of expansion of the universe using the Doppler effect. If the Doppler effect could be explained by another mechanism, such as a natural shift in light wave frequency as they travel through large distances in space. Then we could have a universe that is not expanding overall at all.
Some recent evidence form the study of black holes would suggest that there is an upper limit for the size of black holes. There is also evidence that all galaxies have black holes at the centre. Could these black holes be creating the stars in the galaxies not devouring them. Perhaps there is a balance created in a galaxy where the stars are constantly being recycled by the black hole at the centre. The background radiation attributed to the big bang, may only be the light coming from galaxies so far away that the light is shifted into the microwave spectrum.
Perhaps the universe was always there and goes on forever with no end. Our only concept of time is local. Just because all the local evidence would seem to support the idea that everything has a life cycle, does not mean that the universe has a life cycle.