<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Aboard For Transit Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceline.org/2008/11/20/blog-israel-transit-lightrail-commuter-trains-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2008/11/20/blog-israel-transit-lightrail-commuter-trains-election/</link>
	<description>The Shortest Distance Between You and Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:01:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2008/11/20/blog-israel-transit-lightrail-commuter-trains-election/comment-page-1/#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2008/11/20/blog-israel-transit-lightrail-commuter-trains-election/#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>Aside from the high-speed rail bond (which has obvious plusses but the very big minus of adding more debt to a state budget that is already drowning in red ink), California voters passed 10 of 11 local transit funding measures -- and the one that failed got 62 percent support (damn 2/3 requirement).

In spite of this, the governor (do I need to mention his name) has called a special session to re-do the 08-09 state budget that is already $10-billion-plus out of balance), and his newest proposal calls for an additional 75 percent cut to state transit funding, plus the complete elimination (starting in 09-10) of the only ongoing state funding source for transit operations.

At the same time, he&#039;s parading around Beverly Hills as the Jolly Green Giant at a &quot;global summit&quot; on climate change -- uh, what&#039;s wrong with this picture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the high-speed rail bond (which has obvious plusses but the very big minus of adding more debt to a state budget that is already drowning in red ink), California voters passed 10 of 11 local transit funding measures &#8212; and the one that failed got 62 percent support (damn 2/3 requirement).</p>
<p>In spite of this, the governor (do I need to mention his name) has called a special session to re-do the 08-09 state budget that is already $10-billion-plus out of balance), and his newest proposal calls for an additional 75 percent cut to state transit funding, plus the complete elimination (starting in 09-10) of the only ongoing state funding source for transit operations.</p>
<p>At the same time, he&#8217;s parading around Beverly Hills as the Jolly Green Giant at a &#8220;global summit&#8221; on climate change &#8212; uh, what&#8217;s wrong with this picture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
