<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bacteria for Better Biofuels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceline.org/2009/03/30/environment-rettner-biofuel-alternative-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2009/03/30/environment-rettner-biofuel-alternative-energy/</link>
	<description>The Shortest Distance Between You and Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:48:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dr.m.h.mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceline.org/2009/03/30/environment-rettner-biofuel-alternative-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator>dr.m.h.mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceline.org/2009/03/30/environment-rettner-biofuel-alternative-energy/#comment-2886</guid>
		<description>1-why only Poplar? other better candidates can beprosopis juliflora,salvadora,vetiver etc.
2-we have tried other microbial consorta including Tricho.,bassiana etc with 10 to 20 % improvement but never 80 %! is 80 % not too high?
m.h.mehta</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1-why only Poplar? other better candidates can beprosopis juliflora,salvadora,vetiver etc.<br />
2-we have tried other microbial consorta including Tricho.,bassiana etc with 10 to 20 % improvement but never 80 %! is 80 % not too high?<br />
m.h.mehta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
